Sunita Rani And ANR. v. State Of Punjab And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-1604-2023 Date of Decision : 20.02.2023 Sunita Rani and another ......... Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and others ......... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present :

Mr.Ankit Kharbanda, Advocate for the petitioners.

**** JAGMOHAN BANSAL , J. (Oral) The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to protect their life and liberty.

Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia submits that the son of the petitioner has solemnized marriage with respondent No.4. The son of the petitioner, at present, is in New-zealand. Their daughter-in-law has left her matrimonial home on 13.06.2022 along with gold ornaments and a sum of Rs.70,000/-. They have filed representations dated 15.06.202, 07.12.2022 and 20.12.2022 against their daughter-in-law, however, police is not looking into their representations rather police is harassing them. Learned State counsel on instructions from SI Gurdiayal Singh submits that competent authority would look into the representations of the petitioner and do the needful.

In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the jurisdictional police authorities are directed to look into the representations of the petitioner and take appropriate action in accordance with law. Disposed of.

( JAGMOHAN BANSAL ) JUDGE 20.02.2023 anju Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No ANJU GOEL 2023.02.20 19:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document