Jagjeet Singh v. State Of Haryana And ANR




    
  


 !"#$!%&'&"() * +*

* ,-!! &(,. /*00!11( *
2!3'4'

  !"#35(($(" .!3 ****!'0"($!( '*
)  6 7*
2 










 
 




 



!
"

# 2  8*

7 $
%






 & 


'( '"

"'")

*




+ 

,



-./
!
")
 "0 '1 "'")


0)12"3
$!



021323
021323 02"323



,


4*
2
 3

1565
2

7
,

4

156583 






%

 *




*
&

"



Learned counsel for the appellant contends that appellant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He contends



that vide order dated 25.02.2025, the appellant had been directed to join investigation and was granted interim bail. He submits that in pursuance to the aforesaid order, the appellant has joined the investigation.

4.

Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Kuldeep, who is the Investigating Officer of the case, intimates the Court that the appellant has joined the investigation and is neither required for further investigation nor for any custodial interrogation. 5.

Learned counsel for the complainant has opposed the grant of bail to the appellant and the submissions made by learned counsel for the appellant.

6.

During the course of hearing on 25.02.2025, following order was passed: -
  

        

      



 



 

!"#$

%&   

 %&'()$ 

 %'&('(

%'&('( %'('* ( 

'+*    ( 

&,-,

+ 

 .



   

    

  /    0    

 * 

  1+ 2

     +  .

      

 

 

      

 3

4    5   *  + 

     *

     

 

 

  

  3

   

 3

4            

   

  

      

   3

   



     3

  30   7 89 



8-   

 *

  

 

     &        

    



  :   /% "  3

3   



   

 1;<" * 

 ;  :  * 



  *  



    

       

        



   1;<" * 

  

:

  

0     

 *  

 /-'()$=8 (

  



3 43  *

 

   " * 

 ;    0 > ?

(

  



 



 



4     

3

 

   3      

>

0  

 

   

3<3

 



        ?

(

  



    *  



0 

   3           

  <<  

  5 0   

   

  

 *    7

   



 0  

  !"#       7 

  @ 7.

After considering the rival contentions and perusing the record, it transpires that the appellant has been implicated in the instant FIR for having committed offence punishable 

0)12"3 $!



021323
021323
02"323


,

4
 1565
 





 as per learned State counsel, he is not required for further investigation nor he is required for custodial interrogation of the case. This be the case, the interim bail granted to the appellant vide order dated 25.02.2025 is



hereby confirmed subject to the conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) BNSS. The appellant is directed to join investigation as and when required in future also by way of a written notice for such purpose to be served by Investigating Officer of this case; he will not tamper with the evidence nor will influence the witnesses and will not leave the country without prior permission of the Court. 8.

With these observations, the impugned order dated 06.02.2025 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Special Court, Kaithal, is set aside and the instant appeal stands allowed. 9.


&




9 



2   * +*

    3 :
 ;< =;! 3 :
*< =;!