Jagmeet Singh v. State Of Punjab

CRM-M-1090-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-1090-2016 Date of Decision: February 16, 2016 Jagmeet Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI

Present:

Mr. Surinder Garg, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. P.S. Ghuman, Addl. AG, Punjab, for the respondent.

Mr. Vivek Goel, Advocate, for the informant.

1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the State on instructions from Shri Balbir Singh, Assistant Superintendent, Central Jail, Faridkot, PRASHANT KAPOOR 2016.02.16 17:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CRM-M-1090-2016 submits that as per medical advice received from the Guru Gobind Singh Medical College and Hospital, Faridkot, the petitioner, Jagmeet Singh, is being provided bed rest in the jail hospital. He further submits that every possible medical aid is also being provided to him, therefore, present petition for extension of interim bail be dismissed.

Learned counsel for the petitioner insisted for extension of bail for one more month, which does not appear to be justified.

Dismissed.

It is made clear that if the petitioner does not get proper facilities as stated by learned counsel for the State, he (petitioner) may once again approach this Court. (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE February 16, 2016 Pkapoor PRASHANT KAPOOR 2016.02.16 17:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document