Randeep Singh v. State Of Haryana

CRM No.M-10915 of 2016(O&M) [1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.M- 10915 of 2016(O&M) Date of Decision: May 16 , 2017.

Randeep Singh ...... PETITIONER (s)

Versus

State of Haryana and another ...... RESPONDENT (s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE LISA GILL

Present:

Mr. Madan Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Anmol Malik, AAG, Haryana.

Ms. Harpreet Kaur, Advocate and Mr. R.S.Randhawa, Advocate for Mr. C.K.Singla, Advocate for the complainant/respondent No.2.

***** LISA GILL, J.

Prayer in this petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No.16 dated 16.1.2016 under Sections 498A/406/323/506 IPC, registered at Police Station Kotwali, Faridabad. It is informed that during the pendency of this petition, the matter has been amicably settled between the parties before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court on 13.02.2017. Copy of the settlement reflecting the terms and conditions between the parties is attached with this file. It is submitted that the petitioner and respondent No.2 have decided to part ways. It is informed that petition under Section 13B of the Hindu Omkar Singh 2017.05.17 10:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CRM No.M-10915 of 2016(O&M) [2] Marriage Act, 1955 has been filed and statements of the parties at first motion have been recorded. The parties, it is submitted, undertake to adhere to the terms and conditions of the settlement arrived at between the parties. Learned counsel appearing for the complainant/respondent No.2 affirms the factum of settlement between the parties. It is submitted that in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, there is no objection to the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Vijay Kumar, informs that the petitioner has joined investigation pursuant to order dated 31.03.2016 and he is not required for custodial interrogation. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that the petitioner is likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances as above especially the settlement arrived at between the parties but without commenting upon or expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is allowed. Consequently, order dated 31.03.2016 is made absolute. ( LISA GILL ) May 16 , 2017.

JUDGE 'om'

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No Omkar Singh 2017.05.17 10:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh