State Of Haryana v. Ravinder Kuamr @ Deepak

        

  

 

 !

"# !$%&%"'  ((



)  

*+ ,++

-))

-  . /.

((()

 0+ MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR 








 

HARPREET SINGH BRAR1 (2+3






"
#! 
$%&'$(
) * 
"*+

!,"



$ -$ .- /

0

 
# 
1"*
'23! " 4
)"

 "
) +
* 
5+(
6""



789

:&

& -.

.- ;
* 
"
#! 
$:$
$::<
$%:


8)

#! 
;


! 

) 
+
#3"
=!
!
.- .
' 
>=)#=
!?(

 !
# 

6""



.

  

!




4 *
 *


:@ % -.

.- ;

 <!!"
! 

+ 
"*


!+  

!"


  
 
 +


3

+ *

 



A 

  


 

=
.& -.

.- ;

3

!4
+
9 
# 
6""


 

 <!!"

$

B
#
!"

 
 "0+ 



 
)"

 



!



 + 

5:<!+  




3

5;<


 +


 *
!




3

:


*

4
0

!
!
 !
 !



0 

0
/ -/

CC&




4 !
0
5 $< 

7"

3

+ !
* 
3+ 
0
5 -<A 
"












3"
!"
!
0
" 
"
 !

+

"

"

+

3
"
+ 
  
.
 


3

 
+ !
* 
3+ 

.& -.

.- ;



)"
0 

 



!





3
*
!

+
"
#! :;
)
"

"
+

 <!!"
4

3
!
0
3 !

 
 +


 <!!"

"
+ * ;

4 *



#
!"

"

!


!
 
 
0 
 !






*


3
 *

0
:



 +


 *
!!"!
4

+


0
" 
4
5 $<

 
#!
8<!*
4+
 +
#! 
#


!
!
 ! *



0 


3

/ -/

CC&




+  

 
!

-& -C .--$
4

 
 


+
0
5 $<



!  !





 +

+  

 +

5 $<


 

4 *
*


3



!* ! 
+ 


*

0

"+ 
4  
0

+



 

A  
!

 
)"


  

      


 



!"

0 

!"+

*



!

"+ 
"
#! 
.C

$-


=)#=
!
# !
 
 4
!"+
4
0
4 

  


!"!


3

!
0
!! " 4 
 




+ 


 +


 *
!!"!

/ 7"+


!<3+  
5;< 3
+ 


+ *

 3
0"
!" 

+ 



!


+ 
!


+ *

 3
0


 !




+ *0 
*


3

 
+ 


! 

3
! 
 

 !
!  
 !



 

!!"



4 

 * 

 

+
* 

!!"


+
!
0

3
"
#! :;
)

 


3




+

9 
# 


!" 

4
0
"*
 +


 




" 

3

+ 

4"0 
+
0

* 
8
!








4



*
+ 

:


!" 
!


+ 
! 


3

  



 
 




" "



!<3+  

 



 


!




4 *

$<;
"



   
!


 *
!!"!




 

+!
" *

4 * 


! !


+
!"


 

!


3
 

 

"

!


!
"0 !
!



9 
# 
"

+
0

+

5

<84 * 
= !
 *


3


 *

 
+ 

!



!" + 00 

% The power of the Appellate Court to unsettle the order of acquittal on the basis of re-appreciation of the evidence is subject to the settled law that where two views are possible and out of the two, one points towards the innocence of the accused, the view which favours the accused should prevail over the other pointing towards his guilt. (See H.D. Sundara and others Vs.

State of Karnataka, Criminal Appeal No.247 of 2011 decided on 26.09.2023; Kali Ram v. State of H.P., 1973 (2) SCC 808 and Chandrappa and others v. State of Karnataka, (2007) 4 SCC 415). A Division bench of this Court in the judgment passed in State of Haryana Vs. Ankit and others passed CRM-A No.3 of 2022 decided on 06.07.2023 has held that presumption of innocence further gets entrenched on the acquittal of accused by the trial Court.

8.

In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court finds that learned State counsel has failed to point out any perversity or illegality in findin*
!
0


 
)"
 !

!
0
 )"

"!



+ 







4






   *
+ ! "


'(


 

  
 2HARPREET SINGH BRAR)



 ((



   5
 

*@

D@
5
 0 

D@