Rohtash Kumar Bansal And ORS v. State Of Haryana And Others
!" #$% & '( ! )*
+ !$,$& #$%-$,-!. /*
01- 02,'-!-$ -3-$#10 !
1414$ !
5 ! , 61-1 -!.-$--$#10 !
7$# $1 8%9:86828
828* ;!-3< !
" # $ % &&'(&&)#*
$ %+ % ,!
,- &,!.
/01!&2$ 3 3 4505%4$ ,'
&,!7 8 $
% 3 4505%43 $ +
&
" 8% !.)' 3 + %%#5%% *5+ $% $%3
:
$ $3
5 + 3 4
:/#24 3 !- &,,.!6 &,,.,!
!, &,,6!;
&,,. ,!
,) &,,6
"5%4 4*% 3 % 4"
5% *% 3 &,!,4$% 3
' $3 4505%4 % 3$33
#,'
&,!7 33$ #5% 3 %&& 3 + %$ % $ 33 # %% 3$3 3 * # % 33 3 3 4505%4&!
,;
&,!;$7!3 + $ % 3 %3 33 #
:
* 33 &!
,;
&,!; #$ % 3 8 $3 ,& !!
&,!;
" % &;
!!
&,!) % # $ %#<= &7,;'&,!6$$ &;
,.
&,!6$ 3$ 8 ,!
,- &,!.
= -
* % $ %34505%4 ' 4"
5% *% 3&,!,4 3 3 3
33 # 3 3$ %
: 3$ 3 >= !7 $ $ %3 3 #33 ,'
&,!7 3,6 +
:/ 92$ '/2 &,!, 3 3 $ 333 $ %3 3 % 33$$ % 3 3,6
: ;
? 3 34505%43 33 # 3$ 33 3 8% 33 33 # % 3% ,!
,- &,!./01!&2 3 505%
'
: $ %
3 3 $ 3 3 3 % 8 $%3 333 # $
+ 3 3
)
*
" $
3 8% 33 ,'
&,!7 &!
,;
&,!; 3 3#33% @ .
3 " 5% 4 4 *% 3 % 4"
5%
*% 3 &,!,4 $ % 3 ' + % : / 9 23 4505%4$ 1
! "# $
"
$
!
" # # !
$ % # #
&
#
$
%
%
%
&
#
''
!,
"$ A5%*% B< > 3 3
3&7 !& !.)'
-!
!& !.)' $3 :% &,,6 &,,.
933 +3
4505%4$3 3 3#33 3%/2,'
&,!7 &!
,;
&,!;
" $
#<= &7,;'&,!6 $ &;
,.
&,!6$% % &;
!!
&,!) % 3 3 3 4505%4$ 8 3 3% ,!
,- &,!.
* 3 333 # ,'
&,!7$ %+0 ,6
:/ 92 $ % 3 +%3 4505%4 '&,!, 3 $ %( +%,6 4 " $%% # 33 ,'
&,!7 1 6! -' 7 1414$ !4$!# !
8 ' -!14
-1 !'14$- : $>10 6 !"4& $
/
+4 #-1
! &'' $#-14$ !
> 3 9 !- &,,.
? ,; &
? % !6 &,,.
? ,; -
> 8 3 3 !6 &,,.
? ,;
> 8 3 ,!
!, &,,6 ? ,6 ;
%> !6 &,,.
? ,; '
3 A -, !, &,,6 ? ,6
C3 = !-B;
$ %,; %
:$ % = 7B'
:$ ,6 $%3 50 5% #33 ,'
&,!7 $+3 % 3
3$ % % 33 3
* $ 3 3
3 % $%3$ 3 % 33 #% % 3 $ 3 >33 3 3 #33 3 3 %3 % %
!!
> 4 3# () *# * + ,-./ 0 1 , (2324-5) 0"627$ %$4 3 4%34 D
)
) *
% (
+,)
E* $$ 3 F G3%$ + !'#
? " 8%3 1 -.+'/% $
)
'01 #
%# '0
% %
2
*
%
(
+, )
'3 !&
" 4 3 # (8 5 , . + +,-(2339 4"0:;67($ %$ 3 4% 4 D % 3 3 9 3 3
%E " 8%3 1 " 14. Article 14 of the Constitution of India providing for the equality clause is a positive concept in terms whereof, the equals, subject to certain exceptions, are to be treated equally and unequals cannot be treated equally. If a relaxation has been granted in case of one employee on the basis of the materials available before the Board, the same by itself may not be treated to be a binding precedent so as to enable the Tribunal or High Court to issue a writ of or in the nature of mandamus. Our attention has not been drawn to any provision under the aforementioned circular or otherwise that
/ the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax had any power of relaxation. If there are no vacancies, orders of transfer could not be made. Even if no vacancy existed in respect of the direct recruit quota, the respondents could not have been transferred. In absence of any power of relaxation, the respondents could not have been accommodated on the post of UDCs and they could be transferred only on the post of LDCs which were vacant at the relevant time. In our opinion, relying on or on the basis of the case of Sri Nair only, the impugned judgment could not have been passed." !-
" 3A%3 4 3# (0 #<. 8
%, (=23; 2"0:66;
$ %$ 3+ D3 3 E D 3 3E " 8%3 1 -45'$
% %
%
+, +,4
+,46 ' 0
% %
'$ 78
$$
# '
9 0 #,+
= 0 !*
5 , 0 !* 5 0.:># ? -
, =23;7 2"0:7423;7 ;"0-@>;9
:$
% ;
+<
+,
%8; 8)=80
;
>
) 8 = % 8
+5)
'0
7
;
%
;
#
8)=80 '
?
% '
)
4
4+,)
% 8 ;
'$
;
8)=80) '5@+<A '
81&) '4B.<5@+@A '
8 (
8'0
% %8 ;
8
;
'$ 8
;
' % #
% %
8)=80
% ;
=
) ' C #
(
;
%
8 8)=80
% ':
!7
3D3 3 %ED E$ $ $ 4) *# * + ,-( (+ +,-(
"= 3 3 3% % 3 % % 3 $ 3
33 3 3#33 3 3 %3 % % 33 ,'
&,!7 &!
,;
&,!; #$ 3 3 # $%8&&'(&&)#* $ 4 4 3%$ + !'#
!;
*$3 3 3% ,!
,- &,!.$%8 &&'(&&)#* + 3$
-$,-!. /*
;828< #** ? * . A.B ? A.B