Charan Dass v. State Of Punjab And ANR
!"!
# $ %% &'# ""
%%%%%% !!
# '
( '")"
*
)#+, # # & '
%%%%%% "- # #"
$
./ % * 0
! "
#### 0
%
2'34 $%& %' ( )
! *"+ ", ** "-*.
/-0 /"* *,
1
"/ & 2 $ !
"0 -"
"-"*345"6
"
7-8 -/ "-"*& & 5 "This petition has been filed seeking quashing on the basis of a compromise arrived at between the petitioner and respondent No.2 of FIR No.125, dated 23.11.2019 (as also all other subsequent proceedings arising therefrom), registered at Police Station Nawanshahr, District SBS Nagar, for the alleged commission of offences punishable under the provisions of Sections 406 and 420 of the IPC and Section 13 of the Punjab Travel Professionals and
Section 24 of the Immigration Act, 1983. A copy of the compromise deed has been annexed as Annexure P-2 with the petition.
Pursuant to the order of this Court dated 05.03.2021, the report of the learned JMIC, Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar, dated 15.03.2021, has been received, stating to the effect that respondent No.2, i.e. the complainant in the FIR, Jaskaran Singh, appeared before that court and stated that the matter has now been compromised between the parties and that he has no objection if the accused persons are 'acquitted from the charges leveled against them' and that he does not want to proceed with the present case.
Learned State counsel has filed short reply by way of an affidavit of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub-Division, Nawanshahr, on behalf of the respondent No.1, which is taken on record; stating therein that there is one more FIR of similar nature registered against the petitioner.
It is also stated in the affidavit that other than the petitioner, Charan Dass, there is also one other accused in the said FIR i.e. Pavan Kumar.
Learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to address the arguments as to how the FIR can be quashed on the basis of a compromise reached, in a piecemeal manner.
Adjourned to 28.07.2021."
,
9 $
*+ -, "-"* & ' &5 :44 1 &
5 &
%& & 1
% ;
/
! "
)
(
(
+
%
)
(
%
<
%4 !# *!#5& ("% *
)#+, # # & '1 24 * 1
*
&6 ' "& ("% /78!
'6# #
& '"
2 94 * :;;1 0)3<!# '
*!#5& =
& '"
>"% *
)#+, = # & '1 ?
24 2'!8!#34
8 -3 # # & '
("% *
&6 ' "&1 2@4 %%% 2'!8!#34 2'!8!#3 -- 3
%@;9
# 9&
* - 8, '1 4
& %4
&=/8" &
%,"-
>& &&
36 1 &4 & '( ? & & & % % '
%
@ 36 1 & 4
%' %
%
36 /8" %>
& % > 4 > & ( )
,-<% )
> &
= %= & 36 4 > & % =
4 & 3 6 @ ( )
5
&
> ( &&
& 1' & 4
=/8" ( )
5 36 1 & 4 /78!
'6#."
3 36 1
36 1
3 % = & .
(% & )
! *"+ ", ** "-*.
/-0 /"* *,
1
"/
!
& 2$!
, are, hereby, quashed qua the petitioner.
2 0
%% 2 @ ' = A @
!