Parminder Singh v. State Of Punjab

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.9761 of 2022 Date of Decision: 22.04.2022 Parminder Singh ..... Petitioner versus State of Punjab ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Rohit Samhotra, Advocate for Mr. Munish Puri, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Sandeep Singh Deol, DAG, Punjab.

Mr. Manuj Nagrath, Advocate for the complainant.

ANOOP CHITKARA J.

Short reply dated 24.03.2022 on behalf of the complainant has been filed and the same is taken on record.

Vide order dated 08.03.2022, this Court had granted interim anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order dated 08.03.2022, the petitioner has joined the investigation. 3.

This fact is not refuted by learned counsel appearing for the State. 4.

Learned counsel appearing for the complainant has strenuously opposed the bail.

5.

Given the nature of allegations, no pre-trial incarceration is required. Without commenting on the case's merits and the circumstances peculiar to this case, the petitioner makes a case for release on bail. RITTU 2022.04.25 10:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M No.9761 of 2022 -26.

Given above, the present petition is allowed. The order dated 08.03.2022, is hereby made absolute subject to strict compliance of condition Nos.18 and 19 within a period of 10 days, if not already done. In case, it not comply with, on this ground alone, the bail may be cancelled. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 22.04.2022 rittu Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No RITTU 2022.04.25 10:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document