Feroz Khan @ Sonu & ANR. v. Ut Of Chandigarh & ANR.

CRM-M-10163-2015 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-10163-2015 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 16, 2015 Feroz Khan @ Sonu and another .....Petitioners

Versus

State of U.T., Chandigarh and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI

Present:

Mr.Sonu Giri, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr.A.S.Sullar, A.P.P., U.T., Chandigarh.

Ms.Neelam Nehra, Advocate for respondent No.2.

........

1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from SI Rohit Kumar, Police Station, Mani Majra, U.T., Chandigarh, very fairly concedes that in compliance of the order, dated 30.03.2015, the petitioners have joined the investigation and they are no more required for custodial interrogation, MEENU 2015.10.16 17:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CRM-M-10163-2015 (O&M) -2Learned counsel for the informant/aggrieved person has no objection if the present petition is accepted and the petitioners are granted the benefit of anticipatory bail. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and going through the material available on record, interim directions issued vide order, dated 30.03.2015 are made absolute. The petitioners shall continue to join the investigation as and when required to do so and abide by all the conditions laid down under Section 438(2), Cr.P.C.

October 16, 2015 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) meenu JUDGE MEENU 2015.10.16 17:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh