Anjali And ANR v. State Of Punjab & ORS




    
       Date of decision: 26th May, 2015  Anjali and another  Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and others  Respondents        !
  !
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Ashok Singla, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. C.S. Brar, Dy. Advocate General, Punjab with HC Ramesh Chand.

for respondents No.1 to 3 None for respondents No.4 to 7.

 !
"#  $ Learned State counsel has placed on record statements of the petitioners whereby they have stated that the threat perception to their lives and personal liberty no more subsists. In this view of the matter, learned counsel for the petitioners has made statement before this Court withdrawing the present petition.

The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.05.28 14:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



   However, the petitioners shall be at liberty to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court in case any such eventuality so arises. #  !
$   %& '"  
 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.05.28 14:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court