Harbans Lal Sidana And ANR v. State Of Punjab
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-10255 of 2017 Date of decision: 08.05.2017 Harbans Lal Sidana and another ....Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE REKHA MITTAL
Present:
Mr. Abhinav Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners.
REKHA MITTAL J. (Oral) Counsel for the petitioners would state that as charge has been framed against the petitioners and the same has been challenged by way of revision, the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn but without prejudice to rights of the petitioners to file a fresh petition challenging order framing charge as well after doing the needful. Ordered accordingly.
(REKHA MITTAL) JUDGE 08.05.2017 yakub Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes/No Whether reportable:
Yes/No Mohd. Yakub 2017.05.10 09:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh