Asha Gupta And ORS v. State Of Punjab
! "#$# %&''
(
( ''' # % )$ *$'
( ''' $+ %, %
& -. ' ( (
.
!
"
!
# (
.
/' $ 0# !$ 123
&'( !) (*(+
,
-./ ) **((
(0 *$ (*(1
+$'2&3 4$2(3 ! ,
),
2!)3
(*(+
%, " ( ,
-./
5 "Statement of Salim Khan is son as of Budh Ram resident of Sangrur M. No. 98720 40139. Stated that I above said address. am a resident of Naresh Kumar Jain son of Kaur zen resident of thru Gate, Sangrне had entered into an agreement to purchase one constructed house measuring 230 square yards, which is bounded as underr East 53 house of Mangat Ram and Street, West 11 x 3 curve and curve and 11 x 6 and 12 x11 and 14 Baldev Krishan and
36 x 6 Baldev Saini, situated in Delhi Mandir Wali Gali, Nabha Gate, Sangrur, with Asha Arora, Usha Arora and her husband Varinder Kumar and with the consent of Vinod Kumar for a sum time, Asha of Rs. 22,00,000/ . Arora, Usha Arora At that aforesaid were residing in 184 square yards out of constructed 230 square yards and were owners of remaining site and above said Usha Arora is power of attorney holder of their share of land. All of them had assured me and my family that they will give possession of 230 square yards of the above said house to me at the time of execution of sale deed.
That above said Usha Arora and Asha Arora had assured me that as per above said agreement, after taking the money and by giving possession of above said constructed house, they will be bound to get executed the sale deed and in case there in any type of legal defect regarding property. then accused shall be responsible angle. above said from every That as per above said agreement and assurance given by them, I had given Rs. 4,00,000/ Arora and they to Asha Arora had assured and Usha me that possession of above said constructed house 230 square yards will be given to me prior to execution of sale deed and above said accused executed 2 sale deeds said constructed house of above measuring 230 square yards in favour of my wife Rahisha Bano vide Deed No. 2023 24/128/1/414 dated 28.04.2023 and deed No. 2023 24/128/1/446 dated 02.05.2023.
That after execution of above said sale deeds, when I and my family started raising construction from South side i.e side of Baldev Krishan, then above said Raju Vohra, his sister Mamta and his chacha Bittu started stopping us and as per them, they were stating that it is street. When I showed the sale deeds to above said Vohra etc., they clearly said that they do not admit those sale deeds, nor they will allow construction of house. In this regard, above said Raju Vohra has filed a civil suit in Iwarned District Court, Sangeur. When I talked to Asha Arora, Usha Aroray Varinder Kumar, Vinod Kumar aforesaid in this regard, they all said that they have taken the money and have executed the sale deeds and now it is for us to see or Raju Vohra etc and they have no concern.
there and I requested that we have given the money as per agreement and Raju Vohra is your relative and either they should give possession of above said constructed house or ask Raju Vohra not to stop us from raising construction of house and to withdraw the suit filed in court, so that we may raise construction of Firstly, above said Varinder Vinod Kumar did not care a our house. Kumar and fig and then later, above said all accused with their common intention said that they were to commit cheating with us and have done so and we should take whatever action we muld take and we could cause no harm to theme and that they have approach to hian ups and it we initiated any action, then they will grab the remaining portion of the house also.
As such, above accused, with their common intention, took total amount as per agreement and did not give complete possession of constructed house above said measuring 230 square yards and all of them with their common intention, have committed cheating with us and after filing false suit against us, want to grab more money. On the other hand, they are issuing threats family. In case we suffers any loss then above to or our life to our family member and property, said person shall be responsible. Therefore, on the basis of above said facts, FIR under appropriate sections be registered against above said persons and justice be imparted to Our life and property be protected.
+
% % # %
%5 3 0! ! 3 + # % )$ 6
, #
,
# 7
# 8 9 #
,
1 01 :
, 7
#
$ ;
,
(' *& (*(+
*( *1 (*(+
-./
7
# +
%5 3 0! ! 3 (
6
# .
,
, 1 01 :
& % 06$#$ !
,
#
8
,
1 01 :
,
,
,
8
8 "#$# % .
,
8 . 8
8 # , < ,
#
&'(2(3 !)
8
85 "When the High Court or the Court of Session makes a direction under sub section (1), it may include such conditions in such directions in the light of the facts of the particular case, as it may think fit, including
(i) a condition that the person shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) a condition that the person shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;
(iii) a condition that the person shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court;
(iv) such other condition as may be imposed under sub section (3) of section 480, as if the bail were granted under that section." 78 #, 8
8 8
# , .
# 7(
.8
''
kv Whether speaking/reasoned :
Yes/No Whether reportable :
Yes/No