Satish Kumar Singal v. Sham Lal Singla And Others

2024:PHHC:025047

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CR No.1096 of 2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 22.02.2024 Satish Kumar Singal ...Revisionist-Petitioner

Versus

Sham Lal Singla and others

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA Present:- Mr. Ajay Aggarwal, Advocate for the revisionist-petitioner.

***** MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J. (Oral) By filing the instant revision-petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner-landlord has sought the indulgence of this Court for the issuance of direction to learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Bathinda (for short 'the Executing Court') to decide Execution Petition No.193 of 2019 titled as 'Satish Kumar Singal versus Sham Lal Singla and another' in a time bound manner, while averring that he is 77 years old and had filed the above-referred Execution Petition in the year 2019 and the same has not yet been decided.

2.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner-landlord in the present revision-petition, at the preliminary stage and have also perused the file carefully.

3.

Keeping in view the facts that the petitioner happens to be a senior citizen and the afore-mentioned Execution Petition is pending NEETU RANI 2024.02.23 15:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD

CR No.1096 of 2024 (O&M) -2- 2024:PHHC:025047 adjudication for the last about 41⁄2 years and without commenting or expressing any opinion on the merits thereof, the revision-petition in hand is, hereby, disposed of with a direction to the concerned Executing Court to conclude the proceedings and to decide the Execution Petition under reference, in accordance with law, as early as possible. 22.02.2024 (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) neetu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether Reportable:

No NEETU RANI 2024.02.23 15:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD