Sakuntala Rani v. State Of Punjab

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No. 11202 of 2018 DATE OF DECISION :- July 02, 2018 Sakuntala Rani

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN Present:- Mr. P.B.S. Goraya, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Dhruv Dayal Sr. DAG, Punjab.

*** Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner has since joined the investigation. This fact is conceded by learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Balwinder Singh. The F.I.R. has been registered for offence under Section 498A IPC only and no offence under Section 406 IPC is there. The petitioner is mother-in-law of the complainant and is aged about 60 years. Under the circumstances, custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not found to be necessary.

Therefore, the interim bail granted to the petitioner on 16.3.2018 is made absolute, subject to her fulfilling conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The petition stands allowed accordingly.

(H.S. MADAAN) JUDGE July 02, 2018 p.singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Parvinder Singh 2018.07.02 15:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh