High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/10356/2017dismissed

Vinay v. State Of Haryana

2019-05-30Mrs Justice Daya Chaudhary1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-10356-2017 Date of decision: 30.05.2019 Vinay ..... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN PRESENT: None for the petitioner.

Mr. RK Makkar, Sr. DAG, Haryana.

RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Despite the case having been called twice, the petitioner has gone un-represented.

Perusal of the file shows that since 14.09.2018, despite the instant case having been taken up for hearing thrice, the petitioner had gone un-represented.

Therefore, it can safely be presumed that neither the petitioner nor his counsel is interested in pursuing the instant petition. The same is dismissed for want of prosecution. May 30, 2019 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2019.07.01 14:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document