Khushpreet Kaur And Another v. State Of Punjab And Others

Crl. Misc. No. M-10376 of 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

Sr. No. 110 Case No. : Crl. Misc. No. M-10376 of 2017 Date of Decision : March 27, 2017 Khushpreet Kaur and another ....

Petitioners vs.

State of Punjab and others ....

Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL.

* * * Present :

Mr. Parneet Singh Baidwan, Advocate for the petitioners.

* * * DEEPAK SIBAL , J.

:

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have married each other against the wishes of their family members and on account of this act on their part, they are under threat of being eliminated at the hands of respondents No. 4 to 6. In view of the above, seeking protection, a representation dated 22.03.2017 (Annexure P-5) was made by the petitioners to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala but to no avail.

In the above circumstances, the petitioners have approached this Court through the present petition.

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, particularly the validity of the alleged marriage, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala Monika 2017.03.27 19:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

Crl. Misc. No. M-10376 of 2017 (respondent No.2) to forthwith consider the aforesaid representation dated 22.03.2017 (Annexure P-5) made by the petitioners and thereafter take appropriate action on the same as is deemed fit in accordance with law to ensure the protection of life and liberty of the petitioners. It is made clear that this order shall not be taken to validate the alleged marriage of the petitioners or protect them from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them.

( DEEPAK SIBAL ) JUDGE March 27, 2017 monika Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No.

Monika 2017.03.27 19:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document