High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/10392/2021allowed

Baljit Kaur @ Manjit v. State Of Haryana

2021-04-08Ms. Justice Jaishree Thakur2 pages

CRM-M No.10392 of 2021 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.10392 of 2021 (O&M) Date of Decision.08.04.2021 (HEARD THROUGH VC) Baljit Kaur @ Manjit

...Petitioner

Vs State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR

Present:

Mr. D.K. Sharma, Advocate and Mr. Sukhwinder Singh Kamboj, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. P.P. Chahar, DAG, Haryana.

-.- JAISHREE THAKUR J. (ORAL) This is a petition that has been filed for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in FIR No.88 dated 12.06.2020 under Sections 489-B IPC (Sections 489-A, 489-C, 489-D, 201 and 120-B IPC added later on) registered at Police Station Sadhaura, District Yamuna Nagar. Counsel for the petitioner herein would contend that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the said matter as the petitioner was not apprehended from the spot. The investigation is complete and the challan stands presented. No recovery is to be effected from the petitioner, therefore, her custodial interrogation would no longer be required. The petitioner is in custody since 13.06.2020 and the trial is likely to take some time to conclude, therefore, prays for concession of bail to the petitioner. Counsel for the respondent-State opposes grant of bail to the petitioner by contending that no ground is made out for grant of bail to the petitioner.

PANKAJ KUMAR 2021.04.09 17:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M No.10392 of 2021 (O&M) -2I have heard learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the fact that the investigation is complete and the challan stands presented and the trial is likely to take some time to conclude, this Court deems it appropriate to grant regular bail to the petitioner. The instant petition is allowed and the petitioner is directed to be released on regular bail on execution of adequate personal/surety bond to the satisfaction of concerned trial Court/Duty Magistrate. However, any observation made herein shall not be construed to be an expression on merits of the case. (JAISHREE THAKUR) JUDGE April 08, 2021 Pankaj* Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PANKAJ KUMAR 2021.04.09 17:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document