Ram Prasad v. State Of Haryana And Others

2023:PHHC:076047

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-5601-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision: 25.05.2023 RAM PRASAD ... Petitioner

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL

Present:

Mr. Rohit Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** HARNARESH SINGH GILL, J.(Oral) Prayer in this petition is for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to step up the pay of the petitioner, at par with respondent No.3.

After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of his grievances, the petitioner will move a fresh representation within two weeks from today and he would be satisfied if the said representation is ordered to be decided in a time bound manner.

Notice of motion to respondents No.1 and 2-State only, at this stage.

On the asking of this Court, Mr. RS Budhwar, Additional AG Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2-State and submits that he has no objection if the aforesaid limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is allowed. AMAN JAIN 2023.05.25 16:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-5601-2023 -2In view of the above and without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the petitioner would be at liberty to move a representation for redressal of his grievances, within two weeks from today, if so advised.

On his doing so, respondent No.2-Director, Elementary Education, Haryana, is directed to decide the said representation, within a period of eight weeks thereafter, by passing a speaking order, as per law. Disposed of in the above terms.

25.05.2023 (HARNARESH SINGH GILL) Aman Jain JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No AMAN JAIN 2023.05.25 16:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document