Raj Kumar v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-10447-2015 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-10447-2015 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 09, 2015 Raj Kumar ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr.Sumit Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Pawan Gaur, DAG, Haryana.

Mr.I.S.Pabla,Advocate for the informant.

.......

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.(ORAL) Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Brij Pal Singh, Police Station,City, Panipat, District Panipat, submits that despite the directions issued by this Court on 20.08.2015, the petitioner has failed to join the investigation. Learned counsel for the State has pointed out that there are serious allegations of breach of trust by the petitioner and MEENU 2015.10.13 11:00 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CRM-M-10447-2015 (O&M) -2recoveries are to be effected, therefore, custodial interrogation of the petitioner would be necessitated.

After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and going through the material available on record, this Court also finds that it is not a fit case where the petitioner can be extended the benefit of the anticipatory bail.

Dismissed.

Interim directions issued vide orders dated 15.05.2015 and 20.08.2015 are hereby vacated.

October 09, 2015 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) meenu JUDGE MEENU 2015.10.13 11:00 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh