High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/17179/2000dismissed

Kuldip Singh Rana v. Union Of India

2026-03-11Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil13 pages

! "

# $

% &'(%) "* '** "* ")%

+,-.

////

* +0 1 .

"2 $ $ ₹ "344+5 $

$ "

" 2 6 $

% 4 % 7 * " 38% 5.9" ₹

"344+5 :4;

6 $

* < 3 " =#= 340 => 33.

33"? 1 ' 8?1'9

$@@

< "33* $ $ $ " = A $ 5 B "

" ?1'

03331 2 " A 5 5 > " < 1 %

) .

$ $ < 1 ?

" = $

# "

> " ) *

2 $ " <

"8*

6 %5 %5!9 ₹ "344+5 $

"% % - 8*

6 %5 9 =)5#= ₹ !D 0" 6 ₹43+5 ₹3+5"

$ $ => $

%4 % 7 * "38% 5.9*$ 6

" 4 ! "2

₹"344+5 6 $

> " =

7 # ! > " E

$ ₹ $ "344+5 $

0 E

$ =

= >

. 6

=)5#= >" 2 $6 $

% 4 % 7 * "38% 5.9

4 E

$ $ $ $ $ . $ ? 1 '

A 3 E

$ 2

=" = >" 6 = #$ 8 )9 $ %1?* 8% 9" *$ %%- . "

% 5..- 334"

6 $2

$ %*-8-79

% * " ₹ "344+5

# $ * " 6

$ -

$ ="

$- 2 $

" $ " $ $

6 $ $

$ 1 )

$ $62

& $ ) 1 % & '

! ()*+), - ' .+/" 1 $

$ $

$ $ = 1 6

)

7 6

16. We are concerned with the excess payment of public money which is often described as "tax payers money" which belongs neither to the officers who have effected over payment nor that of the recipients. We fail to see why the concept of fraud or misrepresentation is being brought in such situations. Question to be asked is whether excess money has been paid or not may be due to a bona fide mistake. Possibly, effecting excess payment of public money by Government officers, may be due to various reasons like negligence, carelessness, collusion, favouritism etc. because money in such situation does not belong to the payer or the payee. Situations may also arise where both the payer and the payee are at fault, then the mistake is mutual.

Payments are being effected in many situations without any authority of law and payments have been received by the recipients also without any authority of law. Any amount paid/received without authority of law can always be recovered barring few exceptions of extreme hardships but not as a matter of right, in such situations law implies an obligation on the payee to repay the money, otherwise it would amount to unjust enrichment.

> "

= " " $" $ $ . 2 $ 6 )

1 " ' $ 0 & '

()**1, 2 ' ./3" $

6 $

$ =

" $ & "58. The relief against recovery is granted by courts not because of any right in the employees, but in equity, exercising judicial discretion to relieve the employees from the hardship that will be caused if recovery is ordered. But, if in a given case, it is proved that the employee had knowledge that the payment received was in excess of what was due or wrongly paid, or in cases where the error is detected or corrected within a short time of wrong payment, the matter being in the realm of judicial discretion, courts may, on the facts and circumstances of any particular case, order for recovery of the amount paid in excess."

4 & 5" 6 ( , ()*+3, . ' 22.7" ) 1

$$1 6 $$ $ " " 6 " $ $

2 $&

= $ $ " $ ! ( " $

' $

2 $

$ = $ $ F8 4 9 8 & : ' ()*+;, +. ' );/7) 1

$" $ $ 2 $ 0

<= > & '

? )*)) ' ' 32;7" 1 2 $$ = . = " ) A

$ $ = 7 6

& "9. This Court in a catena of decisions has consistently held that if the excess amount was not paid on account of any misrepresentation or fraud of the employee or if such excess payment was made by the employer by applying a wrong principle for calculating the pay/allowance or on the basis of a particular interpretation of rule/order which is subsequently found to be erroneous, such excess payment of emoluments or allowances are not recoverable. This relief against the recovery is granted not because of any right of the employees but in equity, exercising judicial discretion to provide relief to the employees from the hardship that will be caused if the recovery is ordered. This Court has further held that if in a given case, it is proved that an employee had knowledge that the payment received was in excess of what was due or wrongly paid, or in cases where error is detected or corrected within a short time of wrong payment, the matter being in the realm of judicial discretion, the courts may on the facts and circumstances of any particular case order for recovery of amount

paid in excess."

4 .

" $ $ 6 .

" 2 $

= " $ =

" 6 "

) A G2 " 6 "

= $ 5nullus commodum capere potest de injuria sua propria

" 6

2 $

$ 3 H =" $ 6 .

" $ A ₹ "344+5

$ 6 = >.

7 *

34 $2 = #= 034 > 33 $ $ ? 1 '

)

!8$9 * * "3!

" " $

= * = $ $ "

" $ -

= * $ "

% 5..

334

= $ . 2 =

*" $ "

= $ $

> $2

" ="

$ .

" $

$ =

C = =

" $5 "

=$ "

$ 2 $

6 G2

$ 6 $

%4 % 7 * "38% .96 F

= .

A ="

- " =

$ $ 62

= $

$ $ = A $

$ " $ $ )

6 $ =

= 6

$ "

A 6

" $ = $" 6

" $ ) A

$ "

$ $

! ₹ H " "344+5

$ $

$ 5= $ $

# .

" $ $

" 6 $ = 0 1 2 " A

1 6 6

$ 4 % "

" ( ) # & Meenu Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No