← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/10482/2015allowed

Jagdeep Singh @ Nikka v. State Of Punjab

2015-07-30Mr Justice Gurdev Singh2 pages

CRM-M-10482 of 2015 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1.

CRM-M-10482 of 2015 (O&M) Date of Decision : 30.07.2015 Jagdeep Singh @ Nikka .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab ....Respondent 2.

CRM-M-11254 of 2015 (O&M) Hardeep Singh & another .....Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab ....Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.P. NAGRATH

Present:

Mr. Bipan Ghai, Senior Advocate with Mr. Paras Talwar, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Gazi Mohd., DAG, Punjab.

Mr. Ankur Mailk, Advocate for the complainant.

R.P. Nagrath, J. (Oral) CRM No. 23976 of 2015 Application is allowed and documents Annexure A-1 to A-4 are taken on record subject to just all exceptions. CRM-M-10482 of 2015 This order will dispose of aforesaid two petitions as the prayer in both the petitions is made under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for the grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No. 95 dated 14.07.2014 for offences under Sections 302, 324, 323, 148 and 149 of Indian Penal Code (IPC), registered at Police Station Lehra, District Sangrur.

All the three petitioners in both the petitions were JITENDER KUMAR 2015.07.31 17:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CRM-M-10482 of 2015 -2summoned by learned trial Court by taking cognizance in terms of Section 193 Cr.P.C. after commitment of the case to Sessions Court. The petitioners were found innocent during course of the investigation. There are total eight accused in this case and out of them four are in custody and 5th accused person was found to be a juvenile and facing separate enquiry.

It is submitted that in terms of interim directions, petitioners have put in appearance before learned trial Court and furnished the bail bonds to the satisfaction of learned trial Court .

Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Makhan Singh submits that the eye-witnesses have also been examined after petitioners having put in appearance before the trial Court.

In view of the above, the instant petitions are allowed and interim bail granted to the petitioners vide order dated 01.04.2015 and 08.04.2015 in respective cases, is made absolute. The bail bonds furnished before the trial Court shall continue during pendency of the trial. Another condition imposed is that the petitioners shall not conduct in a way which may result in delaying the progress of trial.

July 30, 2015 ( R.P. NAGRATH ) jk JUDGE JITENDER KUMAR 2015.07.31 17:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh