Surjit Singh And Others v. State Of Haryana And Others

CRM-M-11527-2016 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-11527-2016 (O&M) Date of decision: 06.02.2020 Surjit Singh and another ..... Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others ..... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN PRESENT: Mr. Satish Goel, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Pawan Girdhar, Addl. AG, Haryana.

Ms. Kamini Jaswal and Ms. Rani Mishra, Advocates for respondents No. 2 to 4.

Mr. RP Daaria, Advocate for respondents No. 5 and 6. Mr. JK Goel, Advocate for Mr. Shrey Goel, Advocate for respondent No. 7. Mr. Deepak Thapar, Advocate for respondent No. 8. RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Through this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., prayer has been made for quashing FIR No. 209 dated 19.06.2013 (Annexure P-7) under Sections 307, 323, 148 and 149 IPC, Police Station Shahbad, District Kurukshetra and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, qua the petitioners.

Heard.

RISHU KATARIA 2020.02.12 19:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-11527-2016 (O&M) -2Investigation has repeatedly been conducted by four different Special Investigation Teams. Final report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C. has been filed against the petitioners and charges have also been framed against them. Therefore, this petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.

The detailed order of even date separately passed in connected CRM-M-43764-2013, Surjit Singh and another Vs. State of Haryana and others, shall also form part of this order. February 06, 2020 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2020.02.12 19:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document