Utpal Prashar And ANR. v. State Of Punjab And ANR.




    
      Date of decision: 28th May, 2015  Utpal Prashar and another

Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and another

Respondents        
  
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Shiv Karan Rana, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. J.S. Brar, Asstt. Advocate General, Punjab for respondent No.1.

None for respondent No.2.

 
!"

# Statements of the parties have been recorded which are supported by their sworn affidavits and this Court is satisfied that the compromise between the parties which has already been reduced into writing by way of compromise deed (Annexure P2) and statements before this Court are voluntary one and are without any influence or pressure.

RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.06.24 16:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



 

 Keeping in view the fact that it is a pure matrimonial dispute between the parties and this compromise will go a long way in ironing out differences in betterment of their future life and in the light of ratio laid down in $%&' %'() * +&+,  -'.&/ &'0 &'+),1 

 "2#   "1%3%'&4# 25 and $6-47%'0,1 %'() &'0 +),18 * +&+,  -'.&/ &'0 &'+),1  9 "5#   "1%3%'&4#  ! the prayer made in this petition is allowed, proceedings by way of FIR No.28 dated 08.07.2011 registered at Police Station Women Cell, Jalandhar under Sections 406, 498<A, 420 IPC and all consequences arising out of the said FIR are hereby quashed. The petition stands allowed in those terms.

A copy of this order be sent to the concerned Court. "

 
#   &: ;! 
 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.06.24 16:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court