Anil Goyal And Another v. State Of Haryana
Manoj Kumar 2018.01.19 09:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND
HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M- 11582 of 2016 Date of Order: 15.01.2018 Anil Goyal & Anr.
....Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMOL RATTAN SINGH
Present:
Mr. Anurag Arora, Advocate for Mr. Gautam Dutt, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Virk, DAG, Haryana.
AMOL RATTAN SINGH, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioners could not deny that as per a judgment dated 04.12.2014, of a Division Bench of this Court, passed in CRM No.M-4211 of 2014, this petition seeking quashing of the FIR has been rendered infructuous, in view of it having been held that an FIR can be registered, though cognizance would only be taken by the competent Court on the basis of a complaint filed before it.
Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. January 15, 2018 (AMOL RATTAN SINGH ) manoj JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No