Inderjit Singh Sidhu v. State Of Punjab & ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-11587-2016 DATE OF DECISION:-01.03.2019 INDERJIT SINGH SIDHU ...PETITIONER...

V.

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.

...RESPONDENTS...

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN Present: Mr. AS Jawandha, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harpreet Multani, AAG, Punjab.

Mr. GS Dhillon, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Jarnail Singh, contends that instant petition has rendered infructuous, in view of the fact that cancellation report has been submitted before the concerned court. In view of the above, the instant is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.

01.03.2019 (RAMENDRA JAIN) sonika JUDGE whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No whether reportable:

Yes/No SONIKA 2019.03.03 02:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh