Rohit Kumar v. State Of Haryana And ANR
CRM-M-10610-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CRM-M-10610-2015 Date of Decision: August 28, 2015 Rohit Kumar
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present:
Mr. Munish Mittal, Advocate, for Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Pawan Gaur, DAG, Haryana, for respondent No. 1.
Mr. Vikram Satpal, Advocate, for respondent No. 2.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the State on instructions from ASI Pawan Singh of Police Station, Kalka, District Panchkula, submits that after getting recorded the statement under Section 164, Cr.P.C., of Manisha, the alleged aggrieved girl, cancellation report has been presented before learned Area Judicial Magistrate. In view of above, learned proxy counsel for the petitioner submits that he has instructions not to press this petition at this stage.
Disposed of accordingly.
August 28, 2015 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) Pkapoor JUDGE PRASHANT KAPOOR 2015.08.29 12:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document