Vishal Puri And Others v. The Union Territory Of Chandigarh And Another



IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-9515-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 18.07.2024 Vishal Puri and others .... Petitioners

Versus

The Union Territory of Chandigar and another .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - Mr. Anshuman Chopra, Advocate with Mr. Deepesh Kakkar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Abhinav Gupta, Addl.P.P., U.T. Chandigarh.
  

   NIDHI GUPTA , J. (ORAL) The petitioners who are the husband and parents-in-law of the complainant/respondent No.2 herein, have filed the present petition for quashing of FIR No. 121 dated 20.09.2019 registered under Sections 406 and 498-A IPC, at Women Police Station, Sector 22, Chandigarh (Annexure P-1) and all other consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 11.12.2023 (Annexure P-2) arrived at between the parties.

Pursuant to the order dated 03.04.2024 passed by this Court, the parties appeared before the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Chandigarh, to get their statements recorded. Learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Chandigarh, has submitted his report along with statements of the parties vide letter dated 07.06.2024. A perusal of the above said report would show that the

 petitioners and respondent No. 2 have appeared and suffered their statements with respect to the compromise, which have been found to be valid, genuine, voluntary and without any coercion or undue influence. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present FIR emanates from the matrimonial dispute between the parties. He further submits that as per report, the present petitioners and respondent No.2 are the only party to the compromise. The petitioners have never been declared as proclaimed offenders and are not involved in any other case.

Vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondent No.2 is taken on record.

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Chandigarh, on instructions from ASI Yudhvir Singh, Women Police Station, as well as learned counsel for respondent No.2 have stated that they have 'no objection' in case the FIR is quashed on the basis of compromise qua the petitioners.

This Court has heard the learned counsel for the parties and has perused the file.

After perusing the report submitted by the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Chandigarh, this Court finds that the matter has been amicably settled between the petitioners and respondent No. 2. Since the matter has been settled and the parties have decided to live in peace, this Court feels that in order to secure the ends of justice, the criminal proceedings deserve to be quashed.

As per the Full Bench judgment of this Court in "Kulwinder

 Singh and others Vs State of Punjab", 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, it is held that High Court has power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to allow the compounding of non-compoundable offence and quash the proceedings where the High Court is of the opinion that the same is required to prevent the abuse of the process of law or otherwise to secure the ends of justice. This power of quashing is not confined to matrimonial disputes alone.

Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of "Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and another", 2012 (4) RCR (Criminal) 543, had also observed that in order to secure the ends of justice or to prevent the abuse of process of Court, inherent power can be used by this Court to quash criminal proceedings in which a compromise has been effected. The relevant portion of para 57 of the said judgment is reproduced here-inbelow:- "57. The position that emerges from the above discussion can be summarised thus: the power of the High Court in quashing a criminal proceeding or FIR or complaint in exercise of its inherent jurisdiction is distinct and different from the power given to a criminal court for compounding the offences under Section 320 of the Code. Inherent power is of wide plenitude with no statutory limitation but it has to be exercised in accord with the guideline engrafted in such power viz; (i) to secure the ends of justice or (ii) to prevent abuse of the process of any Court."

In view of what has been discussed here-in-above, this petition is allowed and FIR No. 121 dated 20.09.2019 registered under Sections 406 and 498-A IPC, at Women Police Station, Sector 22, Chandigarh (Annexure P-1) and all other consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 11.12.2023 (Annexure P-2), are ordered to be quashed qua the petitioners.

  Pending application, if any, stands disposed of. 18.07.2024 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) Divyanshi JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No