Ashsih & ORS. v. State Of Haryana & ORS.




    
      Date of decision: 14th December, 2015  Ashish and another  Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and another  Respondents        
  
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Ravinder Malik, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Munish Sharma, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana for respondent No.1.

None for respondent No.2.



 
!"

# Report dated 03.09.2015 of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jind has been received whereby after recording statements of complainant Archana and the accused namely Ashish and his father Anand Singh, the Court has shown its satisfaction that the compromise has been arrived at voluntarily, out of free will of the parties, without any undue influence, coercion or pressure. Heard.

In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court, being a pure matrimonial case, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in ironing out differences for betterment of future life of the RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.12.17 17:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



    parties and in view of the law laid down in $%&' %'()* +&+,

-'.&/ &'0 &'+),1  "2#   "1%3%'&4# 25 and $6-47%'0,1 %'() &'0 +),18 * +&+,  -'.&/ &'0 &'+),1  9 "5#   "1%3%'&4#  ! the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of FIR No.348 dated 29.04.2013 registered at Police Station City Jind under Sections 498A/323/406 IPC and all consequences arising out of the said FIR qua petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2 are quashed.

The petition stands allowed in those terms.

"

 
#   ,:,3/,12! 
 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.12.17 17:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court