Sushma v. State Of Haryana And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-11580-2018 (O&M) Date of decision: 20.03.2018 Sushma

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR

Present:

Mr. Rajesh Kumar Garg, Advocate, for the petitioner.

**** JAISHREE THAKUR, J. (ORAL) The instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner for issuance of a direction to official respondent No. 2 to register FIR under Sections 376, 377, 506 IPC against respondent No.4 on the complaint dated 04.01.2018 (Annexure P-1) filed by the petitioner against respondent No.4, on which till date no action has been taken by the police.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be satisfied if respondent No.3 be directed to look into the complaint dated 04.01.2018 (Annexure P-1) and take action in accordance with law, in a time bound manner.

Notice of motion.

On asking of the Court, Mr. P.P. Chahar, learned DAG, Haryana, who is present in the Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 3. Three copies of the petition be handed over to him Satyawan 2018.03.21 08:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CRM-M-11580-2018 -2by learned counsel for the petitioner during the course of the day failing which no action is called for. He submits that the complaint dated 04.01.2018 (Annexure P-1) will be decided within a period of eight weeks. Heard.

Without going into the merits of the case, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to decide the complaint 04.01.2018 (Annexure P-1), within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order and take necessary action in accordance with law.

20.03.2018 (JAISHREE THAKUR) Satyawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes.

Whether reportable No.

Satyawan 2018.03.21 08:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh