← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/10866/2017allowed

Parvesh @ Bholu v. State Of Haryana And ANR

2017-04-06Mr. Justice Harinder Singh Sidhu2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-10866 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: April 06, 2017 Parvesh @ Bholu

...Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana and another

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH

Present:

Mr.Rakesh Nehra, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.

Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.262 dated 12.06.2016 under Sections 148, 149, 323, 307, 450 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, registered at Police Station Sadar Bahadurgarh, District Jhajjar. Notice of motion.

Mr.B.S.Virk, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent-State and contested the petition. Mr.Rohit Choudhary, Advocate filed Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No.2 and also contested the petition.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties as well as learned State counsel and have gone through the record. Police record is also available.

Vineet Gulati 2017.04.06 16:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh From the record, I find that the present petitioner is named in

CRM No.M-10866 of 2017 -2the FIR. As per the FIR, he was stated to be armed with pistol and he fired a shot from the pistol which hit the finger of the complainant. Learned State counsel submitted that during investigation, the present petitioner was found empty handed and the fire arm injury was attributed to one Manjit co-accused.

The present petitioner has been in custody since 24.06.2016. He is not required for any investigation or interrogation purposes. The trial of the case will take long time. No useful purpose will be served by keeping the petitioner in custody till disposal of the case. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case, without discussing the facts in minute detail and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail subject to his furnishing personal/surety bonds in the sum of `50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate. April 06, 2017 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Vineet Gulati 2017.04.06 16:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh