Taranjit Singh v. State Of Hy.


  

   

        




            !
""
      

"    #$%&%&'($)* 
    

"   """ $*+'(,$(%* 

 ! -.

"   ""/0 1     -.

"       . 

Present:

Mr. Arun Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Sandeep Moudgil, Additional Advocate General, Haryana for the respondents.

Mr. Rajinder Goyal, Additional Advocate General, Punjab with Mr. Sunil Kumar Vashisht, AAG, Punjab.

**** ""/0 1 ""

.

Learned counsel for the respondents state that Section 66 (3) (l) of the Motor Vehicles Act has, in any event, now been amended w.e.f. 27.09.2001. They further state that the petition is, therefore, now infructuous. The petition is, therefore, dismissed as infructuous. Needless to add that if anything survives, the petitioners are at liberty to apply to have the petition revived.

      

""/0        

     

     .          
""


   Whether speaking/reasoned Yes /No Whether reportable Yes /No Swarnjit Singh 2017.04.24 16:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document