High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/11814/2018allowed

Arun Bahri v. State Of Haryana

2018-04-03Mr. Justice Krishna Murari1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-11814-2018 Date of decision: 03.04.2018 Arun Bahri .... Petitioner V/s State of Haryana

...Respondent(s)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Manjit Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Tanuj Sharma, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Sanjiv Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate, for the complainant. Rajan Gupta, J. (Oral) This petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail to the petitioner in a case FIR No.767 dated 05.10.2016 registered under Sections 406, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC at Police Station Sirsa City.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is incarcerated since 27.02.2018.

Admittedly, investigation has been completed qua him and challan has been presented. The case is triable by Magistrate. Learned State counsel has opposed the prayer for bail. Heard.

Keeping in view that the offence is triable by Magistrate, period of his incarceration and the fact that the trial may take long time to conclude, no useful purpose would be served by detaining the petitioner any longer. Accordingly, petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on bail subject to such terms and conditions as the trial court may deem fit to impose.

(RAJAN GUPTA) April 03, 2018 JUDGE sukhpreet Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Sukhpreet Kaur 2018.04.04 05:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document