Rohit v. Dolly And ORS
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Misc.-M-11077 of 2015 Date of Decision: 28.05.2016 Rohit .....Petitioner
Versus
Dolly @ Geet and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY
Present:
None.
**** ANITA CHAUDHRY, J(ORAL) Even on the second call, no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. There was no appearance on behalf of the petitioner even on the last three dates.
Petitioner was directed to deposit Rs. 20,000/- with the Registrar of this Court within one month as litigation expenses but the petitioner has not deposited the said amount. The respondent would have a right to recover the litigation expenses.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE May 28, 2016 Gurpreet GURPREET SINGH 2016.05.30 10:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh