Sukhpreet Singh v. State Of Punjab

CRM-M-10235-2022 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-10235-2022 Date of Decision: July 18, 2022 Sukhpreet Singh .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ

Present:

Mr.Priyanshu Kamra, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Rakeshinder Singh Sidhu, AAG, Punjab.

Mr.Suresh Singla, Advocate for the complainant.

........

RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J.(ORAL) Instant petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. praying for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.06, dated 25.01.2022, under Sections 363 and 366-A IPC, registered at Police Station Jaurkian, District Mansa.

Vide order dated 10.03.2022, while granting interim protection, the petitioner was directed to join investigation. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that pursuant to the order dated 10.03.2022, the petitioner has joined the investigation and as such his interim bail may be made absolute. Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Joginder Singh, endorsed that the petitioner has joined the investigation and he is no more required for further interrogation.

MEENU 2022.07.20 15:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

CRM-M-10235-2022 -2Learned counsel for the complainant opposes the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner.

In view of the above, interim order dated 10.03.2022 is made absolute subject to compliance of conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

Petition stands allowed.

July 18, 2022 ( RAJESH BHARDWAJ ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No MEENU 2022.07.20 15:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment