High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/11232/2021allowed

Multan @ Tana v. State Of Haryana

2021-03-19Mr. Justice Gurvinder Singh Gill2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-11232-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 19.3.2021 Multan @ Tana ... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL Present:- Mr. Tejpal Singh Dhull, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ambavta, AAG, Haryana assisted by SI Ramesh Kumar.

(proceedings conducted through video conferencing) ***** GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J . (Oral)

1. The petitioner seeks grant of regular bail in a case registered vide FIR No. 333 dated 15.12.2020 under Sections 392/34 IPC at Police Station Sadar, District Kaithal.

2. The FIR was registered at the instance of Vikas Kumar, wherein it is alleged that on 14.12.2020 while he was going in a Bolero vehicle and had halted on the way, a white coloured Swift car stopped near his vehicle from which three young boys alighted and gave beatings to the complainant and snatched his vehicle. The complainant further stated therein that his mobile phone, his clothes bag and a machine were lying in the vehicle.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he is nowhere named in the FIR and that in fact the complainant Vikas Kumar has KAMAL KUMAR 2021.03.19 18:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-11232-2021 (O&M) furnished an affidavit (Annexure P-2) stating categorically that he did not identify the robbers and that he does not identify even the petitioner. He has further categorically stated that he does not have any objection in case the petitioner is granted bail.

4. Although the learned State counsel has opposed this petition, but today Mr. Vijay Dahiya, Advocate, has put in appearance on behalf of the complainant and has stated that he has indeed furnished an affidavit, which is annexed with the petition as Annexure P-2 and that he has no objection for grant of bail to the petitioner, as he could not identify the robbers.

5. In view of the aforestated position, the petition is accepted and the petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail on his furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of learned trial Court/Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate concerned.

19.3.2021 (Gurvinder Singh Gill) kamal Judge Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No KAMAL KUMAR 2021.03.19 18:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document