Surinder Pal Singh v. Chd.Admn.

CWP-4788-1995 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-4788-1995 Date of Decision: October 04, 2016 Surinder Pal Singh .....Petitioner

Versus

The Chandigarh Administration and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDIP AHLUWALIA 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No 3.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes/No 4.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

Yes/No 5.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No.

.......

Present:

Mr.Surender Lamba, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Suvir Sehgal, Sr.Standing Counsel, UT, Chandigarh and Mr.Vikas Chatrath, Standing Counsel for UT, Chandigarh.

........

SURYA KANT, J.

The petitioner seeks a direction for providing basic amenities in the Commercial Area of Sector 40-C, Chandigarh. The writ petition was filed in the year 1995.Much water has flown thereafter. Learned Senior Standing Counsel for UT Administration, on instructions, states that all amenities like approach road, parking place, street lights etc. have already been provided in the market area of Sector 40-C, Meenu 2016.10.19 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CWP-4788-1995 -2Chandigarh. This would render the writ petition as infructuous. However, if the market area is still lacking any amenity, liberty is granted to the petitioner to represent the concerned Estate Officer, UT, Chandigarh, who shall be obligated to consider such representation within three months and if any deficiency is found in the provision of basic amenities, the needful shall be done within a period of four months thereafter. Disposed of in above terms.

( SURYA KANT ) JUDGE October 04, 2016 ( SUDIP AHLUWALIA ) meenuss JUDGE Meenu 2016.10.19 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh