Pargat Singh v. State Of Punjab




    
       Date of decision: 26th May, 2015  Pargat Singh  Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab  Respondent        !
  !
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Viney K. Malhotra, Advocate for Mr. Gurbir Singh Toor, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. J.S. Brar, Asstt. Advocate General, Punjab.

 !
"#  $ Present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.74 dated 28.07.2014 registered at Police Station Cheema, District Sangrur under Sections 61/1/85 of the Punjab Excise Act. Vide order dated 10.04.2015 while issuing notice of motion, the petitioner was granted interim bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer.
RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.05.26 18:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



   It is submitted by learned State counsel on instructions from HC Gurmukh Singh, Police Station Cheema, District Sangrur that the petitioner has since then joined the investigation and nothing incriminating has been found in his possession and that he has no objection if the interim order is made absolute. In the light of the statement made by learned State counsel, the interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 10.04.2015 is made absolute till submission of report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. (challan). Thereafter, petitioner will be permitted to furnish regular bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court. With these observations, the present petition stands disposed off.

#  !
$   %& "    RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.05.26 18:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court