Veena Rani And ANR v. State Of Punjab

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-10882-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision:30.06.2021.

Veena Rani and another

...Petitioners

vs.

State of Punjab

...Respondent

Coram :

Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.S. Walia.

Present:

Mr. RKS Verka, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sarabjeet Singh, AAG, Punjab *** B.S. Walia, J. (VC) 1.

Case is being taken up for hearing through Video Conferencing due to Covid-19 pandemic.

2.

Prayer in the petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in case FIR No.246 dated 7.12.2020 registered under Section 306 IPC at Police Station Chheharta, District Amritsar.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that pursuant to the order of this Court dated 9.3.2021, the petitioners joined investigation, fully cooperated with the police, were released on ad interim pre arrest bail and that their custodial interrogation is not required.

4.

Learned Addl. A.G, Punjab, on instructions from ASI Baldev Singh, confirms that pursuant to the order of this Court dated 9.3.2021, the petitioners joined investigation, cooperated in the investigation, were released on ad-interim pre-arrest bail and RAJESH KUMAR 2021.07.01 16:50 i attest the accuracy and authenticity of this document

their custodial interrogation is not required. CRM-M-10882-2021 (O&M) [2] 5.

In view of the statement of the learned AAG, Punjab, order dated 9.3.2021, passed by this Court, is made absolute. The petitioners shall abide by the terms and conditions enumerated in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

6.

Petition stands disposed of in the aforementioned terms.

(B.S. Walia) Judge 30.06.2021.

'Rajesh'

Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJESH KUMAR 2021.07.01 16:50 i attest the accuracy and authenticity of this document