Krishnawanti v. Harjit Singh & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH FAO-183-1991 Date of Decision : 12.09.2019 Krishnawanti .... Appellant

Versus

Harjit Singh and others .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN

Present:

Ms. Manpreet Ghuman, Advocate for Mr. Prateek Mahajan, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr.H.S.Rakhra, Advocate for respondent No.2.

Mr.Abhishek Goyal, Advocate for Mr. Pardeep Goyal, Advocate for respondent No.3.

**** RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) On the previous date, learned counsel for the appellant contended that the appellant was not responding to his communication. Thus, notice of the appeal was issued directly to the appellant for today.

As per office report, notice sent to the appellant has been received back with the report that he has left the given address whereas respondent No.1 could not be served as he has left the job with respondent No.2.

In view of the above report, the instant appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

September 12, 2019 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) anju JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No -11ANJU 2019.09.13 12:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document phhc