Sham Lal v. State Of Haryana & ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-3184-1996 (O&M) Decided on :13.12.2023 Sham Lal . .Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another . . . Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI PRESENT: None for th e petitioner.

Mr. Saurabh Mohunta, DAG, Haryana.

**** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (Oral) 1.

On 21.07.2016, the following order was passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court: "Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is dead and seeks time to bring his LRs on record. Adjourned sine die to do the needful."

2.

Till date, no legal representatives of the petitioner have come forward to pursue the present petition.

3.

Keeping in view the fact that the petitioner has already died and nobody has come forward to pursue the present petition, hence, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE 13.12.2023 Riya Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No RIYA 2023.12.14 13:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document