High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/1247/2018disposed of

Ravinder v. State Of Haryana

2018-05-18Mr. Justice Jasgurpreet Singh Puri2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-1247-2018 Date of decision: 18.05.2018 Ravinder

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR

Present:

Mr. Manish Soni, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Ms. Gaganpreet Kaur, AAG, Haryana.

**** JAISHREE THAKUR, J. (ORAL) This Court was pleased to pass the following order on 15.01.2018 :- "This is a petition that has been filed by the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No. dated 20.11.2017 under Sections 147/148/149/323/354/325/506 IPC, registered at Police Station Sadar Gurugram, District Gurugram.

It is contended that the only allegation against the petitioner is that he along with others "caught hold, dragged inside and started molesting her" which would be an offence under Section 354 IPC. The co-accused of the petitioner have already been granted anticipatory bail whereas the Addl. Sessions Judge, Gurugram has rejected the bail application of the petitioner holding it to be a serious offence. In fact, investigation has been concluded and the offence under Section 354 IPC stands Satyawan 2018.05.18 16:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CRM-M-1247-2018 -2deleted subsequently on 11.1.2018 in the investigation. Notice of motion for 18.04.2018.

Meanwhile, in the event of arrest, the petitioner be released on interim bail subject to his furnishing personal bonds and surety to the satisfaction of Arresting/Investigating Officer. However, the petitioner shall join the investigation as and when called upon to do so and shall abide by the conditions as provided under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C."

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation.

Learned counsel for the respondent-State confirms the factum of joining investigation by the petitioner.

Since the petitioner has joined the investigation, the petition is allowed and interim order dated 15.01.2018 is hereby made absolute subject to the condition that the petitioner will not tamper with evidence or hamper the investigation; will not leave India without permission of the Court and will comply with the conditions contained in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. 18.05.2018 (JAISHREE THAKUR) Satyawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes.

Whether reportable No.

Satyawan 2018.05.18 16:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh