Ajay Sharma v. State Of Punjab

CRM-M-12472-2018 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-12472 of 2018 Date of Decision: 16.08.2018 Ajay Sharma

...Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Punjab

...Respondent

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Anant Moudgil, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Amitoj Singh Dhaliwal, DAG, Punjab.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to file fresh one. Learned State counsel opposes submission of learned counsel for the petitioner with the plea that despite grant of interim bail to petitioner vide order dated 10.05.2018 with direction to surrender before investigating officer, he has not joined the investigation so far. Vide order dated 10.05.2018, it was specifically ordered that in the event of petitioner's not surrendering before the police within two weeks, interim relief allowed to him in this petition shall stand withdrawn and investigating officer will be at liberty to take him into custody. Admittedly, the petitioner has not surrendered before the Investigating Officer so far and has not complied with the order dated 26.03.2018 and 10.05.2018.

SACHIN MEHTA 2018.08.17 14:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-12472-2018 -2Learned counsel for the petitioner has no explanation for the non-joining of investigation by the petitioner. All the above facts are taken on record.

Request of learned counsel for the petitioner seeking withdrawal of the petition is allowed.

Dismissed as withdrawn.

Petitioner may file fresh petition, if so desired, which will be considered after looking into the facts recorded above. ( SURINDER GUPTA ) August 16, 2018 JUDGE jk/Sachin M.

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No SACHIN MEHTA 2018.08.17 14:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH