Ranjit Singh v. State Of Punjab
-1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-8203-2026 Decided on: 09.03.2026
......Petitioner Versus
......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA
Present:
Mr. Raghav Soni, Advocate for
**** SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (Oral) ! "#$ %& $'$( *+, &(- $('.$'$/ #0 1 #0$1 /0$1 ((( ($"0"1 2 0(1 2'% )&)) 0%&1$'$( 3 4 !! $ ! *+, 3 $('.$'$/
5 '.$'$/
3 66 3 , 0
1+
-2- 3 ) , 0 13 6 7 4 5 3
3
33 3 8 ) , 0 1 ) 3 + ) 3 3 3 0 663 13 33 3
( 9 3
-/) ) : 6
3 3 ): ; ) 9 ) ) " & / +
3
-3-
- 9 )
that there are specific allegations against the present petitioner who is alleged to have raised a lalkaara and was allegedly armed with a deadly weapon i.e. kirpan
) 3 0 663 1 3The allegations are serious in nature and custodial interrogation of the petitioner is required to recover the weapon allegedly used in the commission of offence and hence, the petitioner does not deserve the concession of anticipatory bail. . < # 5 3
3 3 ) 3
)0 1 )
3 allegedly armed with a deadly weapon i.e. kirpan, 3 0 663 1 3:
= 3 > 6) + , )
<?
-4- @
) ) )
)
3 36 ) 3 )
2 + 3 ) ) ) 10.
Nothing observed herein shall be construed as > ) )
(SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE 09.03.2026 Sonia Puri Whether Speaking/Reasoned: YES/NO Whether Reportable:
YES/NO