← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/11197/2021dismissed

Rohit Kumar v. State Of Punjab And ORS

2021-03-12Mrs. Justice Manjari Nehru Kaul2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-11197-2021 (O&M) Decided on : 12.03.2021 Rohit Kumar . . . Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Punjab and others . . . Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL (Through Video Conferencing) PRESENT: Mr. G.S. Ghuman, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Luvinder Sofat, AAG, Punjab.

**** MANJARI NEHRU KAUL , J. (Oral) The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., inter alia seeking issuance of direction to respondents No.2 to 4 for initiation of appropriate action against respondents No.5 to 10, in view of the orders dated 02nd November, 2020, of this Hon'ble High Court, passed in CRWP No. 8987 of 2020, titled as, "Jasleen Arneja and another Vs. State of Punjab and others" to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner at the hands of private respondents.

It has been inter alia contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that even though this Court while disposing of CRWP No. 8987 of 2020, had directed respondent No.2 - Senior Superintendent of Police, SAS Nagar (Mohali), to look into the representation dated 26.10.2020 qua the threats being faced by petitioner at the hands of private respondents. However, the authorities concerned had still not initiated any action against the private respondents.

Heard.

JAWALA RAM 2021.03.15 16:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CRM-M-11197-2021 (O&M) - 2 - While disposing of CRWP No. 8987 of 2020, in view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner, this Court had directed respondent No.2 - Senior Superintendent of Police, SAS Nagar (Mohali) had been directed to look into the representation dated 26th October, 2020 and thereafter, if required, take necessary steps to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner.

In case the petitioner is aggrieved to any inaction on the part of respondent No.2, there are alternative remedies available to the petitioner under the law, which he may resort to. No ground is thus made out to issue any directions as sought for.

Petition stands dismissed accordingly.

(MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) JUDGE March 12, 2021 J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No JAWALA RAM 2021.03.15 16:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh