← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/9429/2024dismissed

Inderjeet Singh Gill @ Inderjit Singh @ Indi v. State Of Punjab

2024-05-27Mr. Justice Sanjiv Berry3 pages

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:- 27.05.2024 1.

 



 

 ....Petitioner(s)

Versus

STATE OF PUNJAB

...Respondent(s)

2.

 

    ....Petitioner(s)

Versus

STATE OF PUNJAB

...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present :

Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Eklavya Darshi, DAG Punjab.

***** SANJIV BERRY, J. (ORAL) 

   !"#  

$ %&$ '( 2.

By way of present petitions filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, petitioners seek anticipatory bail in case FIR (Annexure P-1) as under:

-2-  

  

 ))* *)()*(*+*, ,-."/0*1,234 !(2% 4 $ ,(  & $    !    &

(

 !#

5$    

$ ( $   !& &6!5 $% & 5  &   ( 2( 

   $ #  5$  7

&$  & 

  (  $  !      

%# #$5!

5($%$

5  8$ &   

( 9(

( :(  5!  $5%   '#5 ;6& <$%

55*)()*(*+*,% $+2=)9((%## $5!

5%

  ! (  $ >& !      

 

#&  ($5$  !5%44;

 &

  #># $! ((#

-3- / 3>$ # 

# &"*+ 5(3/")?@"

)?)*!$

(   

  44; 5% !"/ 3>$ # $   >!

/4 &% $ #!  &

( %  #*9()*(*+*,  $

&  

(48$%  $ $ $"

 $ !""*+ 5(3/")?@")?)* $ "6 5   $#5 "

   5 '$6( #!%    

 & !( !  $ ! &! !  %$ 58$ unearth the modus operandi adopted by them in committing the crime. -(  %5$5!& 

% $ !$   5  &  % 8$%   &( 8.

Any observation made above shall not be construed as opinion of this Court on the merits of the case.

(SANJIV BERRY) JUDGE 27.05.2024 S.Sharma(syr) i) Whether speaking/reasoned?

Yes/No ii) Whether reportable?

Yes/No