Inderjeet Singh Gill @ Inderjit Singh @ Indi v. State Of Punjab
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:- 27.05.2024 1.
....Petitioner(s)
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB
...Respondent(s)
2.
....Petitioner(s)
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present :
Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Eklavya Darshi, DAG Punjab.
***** SANJIV BERRY, J. (ORAL)
!"#
$ %&$ '( 2.
By way of present petitions filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, petitioners seek anticipatory bail in case FIR (Annexure P-1) as under:
-2-
))* *)()*(*+*, ,-."/0*1,234 !(2% 4 $ ,( & $ ! &
(
!#
5$
$ ( $ !& &6!5 $% & 5 & ( 2(
$ # 5$ 7
&$ &
( $ !
%# #$5!
5($%$
5 8$ &
( 9(
( :( 5! $5% '#5 ;6& <$%
55*)()*(*+*,% $+2=)9((%## $5!
5%
! ( $ >& !
#& ($5$ !5%44;
&
#># $! ((#
-3- / 3>$ #
# &"*+ 5(3/")?@"
)?)*!$
(
44; 5% !"/ 3>$ # $ >!
/4 &% $ #! &
( % #*9()*(*+*, $
&
(48$% $ $ $"
$ !""*+ 5(3/")?@")?)* $ "6 5 $#5 "
5 '$6( #!%
& !( ! $ ! &! ! %$ 58$ unearth the modus operandi adopted by them in committing the crime. -( %5$5!&
% $ !$ 5 & % 8$% &( 8.
Any observation made above shall not be construed as opinion of this Court on the merits of the case.
(SANJIV BERRY) JUDGE 27.05.2024 S.Sharma(syr) i) Whether speaking/reasoned?
Yes/No ii) Whether reportable?
Yes/No