Santosh v. State Of Haryana

Crl. Misc. No. M-12671 of 2016 -1In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Misc. No. M-12671 of 2016 Date of Decision: 26.05.2016 Santosh ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY

Present:

Mr. P.K.Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Mahima Yashpal, AAG, Haryana.

**** ANITA CHAUDHRY, J(ORAL) The petitioner is seeking regular bail in FIR No. 387 dated 02.10.2014 registered at Police Station Panipat Sadar, District Panipat under Sections 498A/452/ 328/ 304-B/302 read with Section 34 IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner is the mother-in-law who is in custody since 31.10.2014 and main witnesses namely the brother, father and husband of the deceased have been examined and all of them have not supported the prosecution version. He refers to the statements which have been placed on record.

Learned State counsel submits that all the private witnesses have been examined.

The main witnesses of the prosecution have not supported the prosecution case . The petitioner is in custody since October 2014. Without commenting anything on the merits of the case and considering the fact that the trial will take time to conclude, the petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on her furnishing GURPREET SINGH 2016.05.27 10:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

Crl. Misc. No. M-12671 of 2016 -2local surety and adequate bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate.

(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE May 26, 2016 Gurpreet GURPREET SINGH 2016.05.27 10:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh