High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/11818/2017dismissed

Parveen v. State Of Haryana

2017-04-07Mr. Justice Harinder Singh Sidhu2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-11818 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: April 07, 2017 Parveen

...Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH

Present:

Mr.Arun Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.

Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.82 dated 17.02.2017 under Sections 380 and 457 IPC, registered at Police Station Gharaunda, District Karnal.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the record.

From the record, I find that in the present case FIR has been got registered by complainant Surinder Singh, who stated that one Harrow (Agricultural Equipment), which was in his filed, was stolen. The present petitioner has been named by the co-accused who stated that he (coaccused) and present petitioner have committed the offence. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present Vineet Gulati 2017.04.07 17:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh case, I find that the petitioner is required for custodial interrogation.

CRM No.M-11818 of 2017 -2Therefore, finding no merit in the present petition, the same is dismissed.

April 07, 2017 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Vineet Gulati 2017.04.07 17:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh