Harpal Singh @ Shani v. State Of Punjab
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CRM-M-1192-2015 Date of Decision: January 27, 2015 Harpal Singh @ Shani
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present:
Mr. Aminder SinghAdvocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Shilesh Gupta, Addl. AG, Punjab, for the respondent.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the State on instructions from ASI Jagan Nath of Police Station, Bakhshiwala, District Patiala, states that out of ten prosecution witnesses, five have been examined and two have been given up and, as such, only three prosecution witnesses are left to be examined.
In view of above, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition at this stage. Dismissed as withdrawn at this stage.
(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) January 27, 2015 JUDGE Pkapoor PRASHANT KAPOOR 2015.01.28 10:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document