High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/12/2017allowed

Babu Ram v. State Of Haryana

2017-02-28Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj2 pages

CRM-M-12 of 2017 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-12 of 2017 Date of Decision: 28.02.2017 Babu Ram ....Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Ravi Malik, Advocate for Mr. S.K. Panwar, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Gikramjit Singh, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

Mr. Rohan Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Abhinav Sood, Advocate for the complainant.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 164 dated 09.12.2016 registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 323, 324, 452 read with Section 149 of Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC'), at Police Station Khizrabad, District Yamuna Nagar. Offence punishable under Section 326 IPC was added later on. Heard.

Learned State counsel submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required. It is further submitted that the matter has also been amicably settled by the complainant with the accused party and copy of compromise has been given to the investigating officer.

In view of submission of learned State counsel but without Jitender Kumar 2017.02.28 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-12 of 2017 -2expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is allowed and order dated 20.02.2017 is made absolute till the presentation of challan, subject to the following terms:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by the police as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the accusation against him so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court.

(iv) that the petitioner will seek regular bail on the presentation of challan in Court.

February 28, 2017 ( SURINDER GUPTA ) jk JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Jitender Kumar 2017.02.28 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH