Sukhjit Singh Randhawa v. State Of Punjab

Crl. Misc. No. M-1302 of 2016 -1In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Misc. No. M-1302 of 2016 Date of Decision: 19.12.2016 Sukhjit Singh Randhawa ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY

Present:

Mr. J.S.Virk, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. V.P.S.Sidhu, AAG, Punjab.

Mr. B.D.Sharma, Advocate for the complainant.

**** ANITA CHAUDHRY, J (ORAL) Through the instant petition, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 73 dated 22.11.2015, registered under Sections 498-A, 406 IPC, Police Station Women Cell, Jalandhar. Report of mediation has not been received.

Counsel for the petitioner states that pursuant to the order dated 14.1.2016, passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined the investigation. State counsel submits that recovery of 27 tolas of gold and house hold articles have been effected. He states that the petitioner has joined the investigation.

Looking to the circumstances, but without commenting on the merits of the case, the petition is allowed and order dated 14.1.2016 Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2016.12.20 11:00 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

Crl. Misc. No. M-1302 of 2016 -2granting interim bail to the petitioner is made absolute subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438 Sub Section 2 Clauses (i)(ii) and (iii) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE December 19, 2016 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2016.12.20 11:00 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh